Categories
Ways of Researching

Collage: A Creative Tool for Researching Professional Learning

When you think of collage, your mind might go to school art projects or the avant-garde works of early 20th-century artists. But collage is far more than just an artistic technique. In fact, it’s increasingly recognised as a powerful method for qualitative research, particularly in areas like professional learning, where complex ideas and relationships demand more than traditional forms of representation.

What is Collage, Really?

The word collage comes from the French verb coller, meaning “to glue.” While its origins are simple, the implications for art—and now research—are anything but. The term first gained traction in the 19th century, used to describe the pasting of wallpapers and posters. However, it wasn’t until the early 20th century that collage became an artistic phenomenon, thanks to the Cubists of the 1930s. Artists like Picasso and Braque pioneered papier collé, which involved gluing paper fragments onto flat surfaces, creating dynamic and layered works that challenged the conventions of painting.

But what makes collage so interesting isn’t just the technique—it’s the philosophy behind it. According to Etgar (2019), collage emphasizes the meeting points between fragments, drawing attention to the edges where one image encounters another. This focus on juxtaposition allows for new meanings to emerge, turning collage into a form of visual critique. In a sense, collage is about disrupting the seamlessness of traditional art forms, asking us to look closer at the seams and intersections between pieces. It’s an artistic rebellion against smoothness and coherence.

Collage vs. Montage: A Critical Distinction

It’s easy to confuse collage with montage, but they are fundamentally different. Montage, derived from the German montieren, means “to assemble” and suggests a smooth, cohesive final product. Think of it as the factory-line version of artistic composition. In contrast, collage is intentionally fragmented and disruptive. As artist John Stezaker puts it, “Montage is about producing something seamless and legible, whereas collage is about interrupting the seam and making something illegible” (Stezaker, cited in Elliot, 2019). This illegibility, this refusal to be neat, is what makes collage such a rich medium for exploring complex, layered ideas.

Why Use Collage in Research?

So, why does this matter for research, especially in professional learning? In a field where understanding relationships—between people, ideas, and practices—is critical, collage offers a way to visually explore and represent these connections.

In qualitative research, collage has been described as a “representational arts-informed form of inquiry” that uses abstract and metaphorical representations to disrupt the normative ways we understand the world (Plakoyiannaki & Stavraki, 2018). This is particularly valuable in professional learning, where traditional data collection methods like interviews and surveys may not fully capture the nuance and complexity of experiences. Collage allows researchers to explore the margins, the spaces where new meanings emerge, much like how it does in art.

Collage as a Tool for Disruption

One of the reasons collage is so powerful in research is because it refuses to be tidy. It disrupts traditional modes of representation, inviting viewers—and researchers—to question what they see and how they interpret it. In professional learning, this is particularly useful. How do we make sense of fragmented experiences, or the multiple layers of identity and practice that professionals bring to their work? Collage offers a way to navigate these complexities without forcing them into neat boxes.

It also opens up opportunities for critical engagement. By making the seams visible, collage asks us to think about what holds things together—or pulls them apart. This kind of critical reflection is essential in professional learning, where understanding the relational, often contradictory nature of practice can lead to deeper insights.

Making Meaning Across Mediums

Finally, collage engages in something called transmediation—the translation of meaning across different systems, like visual and textual representations (Siegel, 1995). When we “read” a collage, we aren’t just interpreting what we see; we’re also translating those visual elements into other forms of understanding. This process encourages innovative thinking and new ways of connecting ideas, making collage a dynamic tool for professional learning research.


Collage isn’t just about sticking pieces together; it’s about creating a space for new insights to emerge. Whether in the art world or in research, collage allows us to step beyond the boundaries of traditional thinking, making it an exciting and transformative tool for exploring the complexities of professional learning. By focusing on the margins, questioning the seams, and inviting disruption, collage offers a creative way to push the boundaries of how we understand and represent learning.

Acknowledgment
I used AI in developing this post. It was useful for clarifying my thoughts and finding a ‘blogging-voice’ that previously escaped me. I’ve saved the transcript.

Categories
Ways of Learning

Understanding the National Model of Professional Learning Through Visual Design

In the realm of education, visual communication plays a crucial role in conveying complex ideas. One striking example is the National Model of Professional Learning, which is depicted through a compelling circular graphic composed of concentric circles.

The Visual Structure

At first glance, you will notice that the model is designed with four concentric circles (or three rings surrounding a central circle). The two outer rings are of equal width, while the inner ring’s breadth matches the radius of the central circle. Each component features shades of blue and green, with three areas using flat colours and one ring showcasing a gradient that lightens toward the centre. This gradated ring is divided into three equal segments, clearly marked by faint white lines radiating from an unseen centre.

The central circle, coloured blue, is adorned with two green arrows that curve clockwise along its outer edge. The annotations within the circles, rendered in a simple white font, differ in style: uppercase in the outer bands and sentence case in the inner bands, with varying font sizes that emphasize the hierarchy of information.

The Importance of Visual Elements

The interplay of shape, color, tone, and scale is pivotal to the model’s effectiveness. For instance, the contrasting shades of blue and green enhance legibility, as the white font stands out against the colored backgrounds. This contrast is not merely aesthetic; it serves a functional purpose—ensuring that the annotations can be easily read and understood.

Moreover, despite the physical separation between the outer rings and the central circle, the shared blue hue connects them visually, highlighting the relationship between the broader concepts and the core ideas within the model. Such intentional design choices prompt us to consider deeper questions: Who constructed this model, and for what purpose?

The Role of Visual Analysis

Describing these visual elements is more than a superficial task; it’s an essential part of analysis. By unpacking the visual components, we can better grasp the “how” behind the National Model of Professional Learning. This visual analysis is particularly important because it employs a visual language to communicate key concepts and competencies tied to regulatory standards and educational reform.

At the heart of educational policy, this model represents a framework for professional learning, making the need for clear visual communication all the more significant.

The design of the National Model of Professional Learning is not just a matter of aesthetics; it is a powerful tool for communication in education. Understanding how visuals convey meaning can help educators and policymakers navigate the complexities of educational reform. By engaging in visual analysis, we can uncover layers of meaning that influence professional learning and ultimately shape our educational practices.

Acknowledgment
I used AI in developing this post. It was useful for clarifying my thoughts and finding a ‘blogging-voice’ that previously escaped me. I’ve saved the transcript.

Categories
Uncategorized

Why Teacher Professional Learning Matters: A Reflection

I’ve been tying myself in knots trying to write a short blog about teacher professional learning. My goal was simple: to provide an overview of how teacher learning is a vital professional activity. Yet, the very need to explain this has left me feeling stuck.

It’s frustrating, isn’t it? I’ve read extensively, taken notes, applied various analytical frameworks, and examined all sorts of critical aspects. But instead of simply explaining, I find myself defending the concept of professional learning for teachers—advanced study conducted by qualified individuals who have demonstrably elevated levels of competency and a commitment to a specific set of professional values.

What baffles me is that I feel I shouldn’t have to defend professional learning as a “thing”—and especially not as a necessary “thing” for teachers. What other profession faces such scrutiny over their qualifications and knowledge? It’s hard not to feel that, despite our training and expertise, there’s a pervasive belief among the public that teachers aren’t highly qualified professionals.

A Flawed Perception

Consider this: what other profession allows childhood memories to shape public judgments about competency? Just because we’ve been to the dentist as kids, does that mean we know how to extract a tooth? Or because we’ve lived in a house, does that qualify us to build one? So why do people think that simply having attended school gives them insight into the professional knowledge and practices of education?

It’s perplexing. Perhaps it’s me who needs to reflect on this. Do teachers themselves believe they are highly qualified and deserving of respect for their expertise?

The Importance of Professional Learning

Teachers are not just doing a job; they are engaging in a profession that requires specialised qualifications, skills, and knowledge. They are committed to ongoing learning to enhance their competencies. This commitment is essential for improving educational outcomes for students, and it should be recognized and valued by society.

So, as I sit here grappling with how to express these thoughts, I urge you to consider the importance of recognizing and supporting teacher professional learning. It’s not just about defending a concept; it’s about advocating for a profession that shapes the future.

Acknowledgment
I used AI in developing this post. It was useful for clarifying my thoughts and finding a ‘blogging-voice’ that previously escaped me. I’ve saved the transcript.

Categories
Uncategorized

Exploring Visual Interpretation: Reflections on Circle Imagery in Art

Art has a unique power to evoke thoughts and feelings, often prompting us to reflect on our perceptions. Recently, I found myself drawn to a graphic illustration that I found visually pleasing. Its shape immediately reminded me of other circular objects I enjoy, like pies, marbles, and gobstoppers. As I looked deeper, the circles within circles lured me into a contemplative state, invoking images of tree rings, archer’s targets, and even electric hobs.

The colours—varying shades of blue and green—reminded me of many round things I admire: the view of Earth from outer space, ancient circular ruins embedded in hillsides, and the intricate beauty of the iris and pupil of an eye. This visual stimulation opened the door to a wider realm of artworks, calling to mind pieces like Sea Circles Balnakieth Beach 17 May 1992 (Glob, 1992), Interrupted Circle (Riley, 1963), Starry Night (Van Gogh, 1889), and Vitruvian Man (da Vinci, c. 1490). Each of these works explores themes of circles, spheres, and roundness, yet their materials and contexts significantly influence their interpretations.

Take da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man, often described simply as a pen-and-ink drawing on paper. However, a deeper dive reveals that this masterpiece was created using a technique called metalpoint. The process involved preparing the paper with a chalky coating, allowing it to dry before the artist applied initial lines with a metal stylus. Subsequent layers were added with pen, ink, and touches of watercolour, all meticulously applied at different times to ensure the precise lines remained distinct. Therefore, Vitruvian Man can be more accurately characterized as a drawing composed of five layers of diverse media, each contributing to its complexity.

This brings us to an intriguing conclusion: Vitruvian Man is essentially a collage. Understanding the construction of this image—and the tools employed—opens up an opportunity for a richer comprehension of the artwork, its creators, and its audiences. Knowing that da Vinci’s work involved a multitude of media challenges commonly cited facts about the piece. For instance, the assertion that da Vinci was illustrating the mathematical concepts devised by Vitruvius merits a more nuanced examination, especially when we consider the timeline of their respective affiliations.

In art, just as in education, there is much to unpack. Our understanding of visual pieces is shaped not only by their aesthetics but also by the intricate histories and contexts that lie beneath the surface. I invite you to reflect on how these layers influence your interpretation of art and the stories they tell.

Acknowledgment
I used AI in developing this post. It was useful for clarifying my thoughts and finding a ‘blogging-voice’ that previously escaped me. I’ve saved the transcript.

Categories
Uncategorized

Does the National Model of Professional Learning Bug Me?

As I sat down to critique Scotland’s National Model of Professional Learning, I couldn’t shake the feeling that something about it just bugged me. I mean, it’s all lovely blues and greens, with neat circles fitting into other neat circles. Visually, it’s interesting—but isn’t that where the trouble starts?

I’ll be honest: I’m fairly suspicious of anything that looks too engaging. This reaction says more about me than the model itself, but it raises an important question: What am I being persuaded to accept by these circles and colours?

Let me break down my perspective:

The Classroom Teacher in Me

As a former classroom teacher, I have a natural skepticism toward anything that feels like it’s being handed down from on high. When I look at this model, I can’t help but think: Is this what my practice is supposed to look like? Am I already doing it? Do I need to shift gears, and if so, what would that even mean for my practice?

The Lecturer Perspective

Now, shifting gears to my role as a lecturer, I recognise that this model is important for the professionals who come to study with us. It raises another question: What needs to be taught based on this model, and how will that impact what we’re already teaching? The interplay between the model and our curriculum is critical, and I’m left wondering if this visual representation truly captures the complexity of professional learning.

The Artist’s Eye

Finally, as an artist, I can’t help but think about how this model connects to other images I’ve seen. What media were used to create them? What meanings and feelings do they evoke? Am I compelled to respond in kind, or do I want to carve my own path in how I interpret and implement professional learning?

Reflecting on the Model

So, here I am, grappling with the tension between the aesthetic appeal of the model and the critical questions it raises. First, I want to take a moment to describe this model in more detail, focusing on its graphic design and what it visually communicates.

But more importantly, I want to explore how we, as educators and practitioners, can navigate the space between pleasing aesthetics and the gritty reality of our work. Because while it may be visually attractive, perhaps even seductive, I can’t help but wonder if the National Model of Professional Learning holds up when we explore its implications.

Stay tuned as we unpack these thoughts further!

Acknowledgment
I used AI in developing this post. It was useful for clarifying my thoughts and finding a ‘blogging-voice’ that previously escaped me. I’ve saved the transcript.